Monday, September 15, 2014

Former Bank Exec Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Investors, Regulators

Former Bank Exec Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Investors, Regulators

fraudA former bank executive pleaded guilty earlier this week to charges of defrauding regulators and his bank's investors, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP) and other investigators announced recently.
Don A. Langford, 63, a former senior vice president and chief credit officer for Lincoln, Nebraska-based TierOne Bank (a former TARP fund applicant) pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, and making false entries in a bank’s books and records, in addition to one count of making false statements according to Romero, Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Deborah R. Gilg of the District of Nebraska, and Special Agent in Charge Thomas R. Metz of the FBI’s Omaha Division. Langford is scheduled to be sentenced on December 5, 2014.
Langford, who now resides in Gibsonia, Pennsylvania, entered his guilty plea with U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart of the District of Nebraska. The criminal investigation revealed that Langford and his associates were able to cover up millions of dollars in losses by falsifying the value of TierOne's loan and real estate portfolio in reports U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) from at least 2009 to April 2010.
TierOne submitted an application to OTS in 2008 to receive monetary assistance from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), but eventually withdrew the application without receiving any funds from TARP. OTS shut down TierOne in June 2010 and the bank filed for bankruptcy shortly afterward.
"Langford, former TierOne senior executive and chief credit officer, conspired with others to hide losses at the bank by cooking the bank’s books and reporting falsified information to stakeholders, regulators, external auditors, and the investing public," Romero said. "Langford and others engaged in fraud in order to keep regulators at bay and from closing the bank, to maintain and increase the bank’s stock price, and to enrich themselves. The bank even made an unsuccessful attempt to get taxpayer TARP funds in November 2008. SIGTARP and our law enforcement officers will bring to justice perpetrators of fraud related to TARP and hold them accountable for their crimes."

REOs Fall Year-Over-Year for 21st Straight Month

Source: DSNews.com


Author: Brian Honea September 12, 2014
bank-owned-fiveThe number of residential properties repossessed by lenders by way of foreclosure in August declined on a year-over-year basis for the 21st consecutive month, according to RealtyTrac's monthly U.S. Foreclosure Market Report for August 2014released September 11.
The number of REO properties, which represent the final stage of the foreclosure process, was reported to be 26,343 for August, according to RealtyTrac. This was a slight increase of 2 percent from July but a significant drop of 33 percent from August 2013.
RealtyTrac reported that REO activity went down year-over-year in all but seven states: Georgia (increase of 146 percent), Hawaii (42 percent), Oregon (20 percent), Kentucky (13 percent), Pennsylvania (12 percent), Connecticut (10 percent), and Virginia (.3 percent, from 520 to 522).
According to RealtyTrac, the state with the most REOs in August overall was Florida, with 5,277, which was a 37 percent drop year-over-year for the Sunshine State. Georgia had the second most total REOs in August with 4,204, and California was third with 2,152. North Dakota had the lowest number of REOs for August with 0, according to RealtyTrac. The Peace Garden State had only two REOs in July, and had 10 in August 2013. After North Dakota, the District of Columbia had the second lowest number of REOs in August 2014 with two.
REO activity increased month-over-month in 21 states; in all others, it either declined or stayed the same from July to August. Georgia had the largest month-over-month increase with 196 percent (1,421 up to 4,204), while Maryland had the largest decline from July to August with 81 percent (1,103 down to 207).

Friday, September 12, 2014

Building For The Future

Innovative construction materials are both eco-friendly and resilient.
It’s easier to adopt new techniques when you’re building from scratch, so the new-home market tends to have more than its fair share of inventive products to offer.
Before these new products come to market, they often come to Michelle Desiderio. As the vice president of innovation services for Home Innovation Research Labs—a wholly owned, independent subsidiary of the National Association of Home Builders—she works with manufacturers to test building products and appliances. At the manufacturer’s request, the lab’s technicians will do everything from open and shut a door 10,000 times to drop cast-iron pans onto sinks to build a model house to test the impact of high winds on a new framing technique. “Our goal is to remove barriers to innovation in the housing industry,” she says.
So what kinds of advances are buyers looking for? “Builders often are under the assumption that consumers are focused on green products exclusively, but study after study shows that’s not the case,” says Desiderio. “Durability usually ranks very high.”
Brent Ehrlich, products editor at publishing company BuildingGreen, which examines environmentally friendly construction, says that manufacturers are taking notice of the desire for resilience. He’s also seeing more use of natural materials such as stone and cork, which he says represents the “what’s-old-is-new phenomenon” taking hold. One example of this trend is the use of mineral wool for insulation. Ehrlich says this material is replacing spray foam insulation systems that “contain some fairly nasty chemicals.” Also, the natural alternative is both flame-retardant and difficult for insects to penetrate.
Another product Ehrlich is excited about is fungal mycelium. A company called Ecovative combines what are basically mushroom roots with agricultural byproducts in controlled lab conditions. The product that emerges is currently being used as an eco-friendly packing material, but the company is working to market it as a strong, lightweight, flame-resistant insulation for homes and commercial buildings.  
But Ehrlich warns that in the effort to make homes more energy-efficient, home owners need to be careful not to seal the structure’s envelope too tightly. He’s says he’s seen cases where home owners try to retrofit their insulation for energy efficiency and end up having to tear it all out and start over because they hadn’t considered healthy air exchanges and letting a building breathe.
Innovators in new construction are also looking for ways to protect home owners from catastrophic events. “Many places in the country have experienced one natural disaster after another,” Desiderio says. “So we have this relatively new goal of how to make homes more resilient in a disaster.”
Ehrlich says that, despite the great work of Home Innovation Research Labs, no amount of testing can fully replicate the pressures of real-world use for some of these brand-new products: “We really don’t know how they’ll last. Longevity is still going to be a question.”
Because defects in new homes can directly affect the entire system of a house, builders tend to be wary about new products. “As a society, we change phones frequently, but product manufacturers have a much more difficult time getting their clients to switch in the world of home construction,” Desiderio says.

Priced to Sell at $30M? Apparently, Yes!

Luxury homes are selling faster than last year, and the homes fetching some of the heftiest price tags are spending less time lingering on the market, according to new data from realtor.com®. An uptick in the stock market and improving economy may be helping to boost the luxury market in recent months.
The High-End Market isBooming:
For homes listed less than $1 million, the median age of listings ranged from 80 days to a median of 180 days for homes just under $30 million, according to realtor.com®. But for homes above $30 million, the median time to market dropped to 139 days.
Jonathan Smoke, realtor.com®’s chief economist, says the faster times are often because these high-ticketed homes are marketed quietly before hitting the open market. This market segment is attracting a more engaged group of buyers lately, he says.
For example, in Vail, Colo., homes above $15 million used to sit on the market for more than two years, but now are selling in “months, not years, and sometimes in weeks,” Tye Stockton, a real estate professional with Ascent Sotheby’s International Realty, told The Wall Street Journal. In Greenwich, Conn., Tamar Lurie with Coldwell Banker told The Wall Street Journal that she is expecting about 20 sales above $10 million this year – double the number sold last year.
A $2 million listing in the Hancock Park area of Los Angeles sat on the market last year before it was removed after never hooking a buyer. But this month, the owners put the home back on the market and sold above the asking price in just one day, says Billy Rose, co-founder of the Agency, a real estate brokerage in Beverly Hills, Calif.
Source: “Luxury Homes: Priced to Sell at $30 Million,” The Wall Street Journal (Sept. 10, 2014)

Housing Price Cuts Point To A Shift In Southern California's Southland Market

Source:  latimes.com



Housing price cuts point to a shift in Southland market


Real EstateBusinessHomesReal Estate SellersReal Estate Buyers
The number of homes with reduced asking prices has risen sharply in recent months, a reversal from last year
No longer a seller's market? In O.C., about one-third of home sellers have had to cut their prices
Buyers are gaining leverage in Southern California's housing market: Price cuts are back
The latest sign that buyers are gaining leverage in Southern California's housing market: Price cuts are back.
The number of homes with reduced asking prices has risen sharply in recent months, a reversal from last year's sellers' market, when list prices seemed more like a floor than a ceiling.
In Orange County, the region's priciest market, about one-third of sellers have been forced to cut prices, according to data from real estate firm Redfin. Across the Southland, prices have hit a plateau this summer, with sales volume slumping as buyers got pickier.


These trends have been building all year. But home sellers -- often the last to see market shifts -- are finally getting the message, said Paul Reid, a Redfin agent in Temecula.
"A lot of what we've seen over the last six or eight weeks is people lowering their prices to get buyers in the door," Reid said.
The shift from a red-hot sellers' market to something more balanced is reflected in price trends.
Every month for nearly two years, starting in mid-2012, the median home price in Southern California notched double-digit annual gains, according to housing data firm CoreLogic DataQuick. The growth peaked last June, with a 28% gain.


But the 9.1% year-over-year increase in August marked the third straight month of single-digit gains. In higher-priced parts of the region, gains are even slower; it was just 5.4% in Orange County.
Still, August's median was $420,000, the highest point since the recession started in December 2007. That's keeping many buyers on the sidelines, said Andrew LePage, an analyst with CoreLogic DataQuick.
"Prices are high enough to be a hurdle for a lot of buyers," he said.
After two years of bidding wars and big price run-ups, some sellers have yet to come to terms with reality, said Steven Thomas, chief economist at Reports on Housing, which tracks the Southern California market.


"People have been putting a sign in the yard and expecting offers immediately. That's not reality," Thomas said. "In a normal market, you've got to put some work into selling it."
David Silva, a veteran agent with Ricci Realty in Orange, has watched as the number of homes for sale in that Orange County town ballooned from about 100 in early 2013 to about 270 today.
With more competition on the market, some of his clients have had to cut prices to drive up interest. He's heard stories from colleagues about would-be buyers walking away from contracts when they found a better house for less money.


"It comes down to affordability," Silva said. "A lot of people are looking for a good deal. The lower-priced properties are going quickly. The mid-range inventory is taking longer."
Silva said some of his clients are receptive to the idea of cutting prices to sell their homes. But some sellers -- those with less motivation to move now -- are pulling their homes off the market, said Steve Shrager, an agent with Coldwell Banker in Studio City.
Sellers who can't get the price they want are choosing to rent their home, or try to sell again in another year.
"They feel the price can't go anywhere but up," Shrager said.
Buyers are choosier too, he notes. Though price growth has leveled off, many buyers still aren't seeing bargains. And while the selection of homes has expanded, some aren't finding any property they really want.


Some, he said, are choosing to stay put, or maybe try the market again next spring.
"I don't want to use the word correction, but we're in a bit of an adjustment period right now," Shrager said.
Waiting for the spring selling season is fairly normal behavior for both buyers and sellers, Thomas said. But after a decade of boom, bust and boom again, many aren't sure how to react to a normal market.
"People are not used to this," he said. "That's why you get some panic. Eventually these houses will sell. You just have to be patient."
Patience and price cuts are paying off for Joseph David, an investor and rehabber who listed a blue three-bedroom Craftsman in Highland Park in late June at $624,990. When it went on the market, his agent got a lot of phone calls. Dozens of people showed up at open houses. But none of them pulled the trigger.
"We got a lot of response, but we didn't get any offers," David said. "There were a lot of looky-loos."
Before long, he knocked a bit off his asking price. Then earlier this month, he cut it more sharply, to $549,000.
Interest picked up dramatically. His agent started to get a lot more phone calls, making David confident he'll get that offer soon.

Fannie Mae Relaxes Waiting Period for Distressed Borrowers

Source: http://dsnews.com
Author: Brian Honea September 11, 2014
Waiting Period Distressed Borrowers
Fannie Mae recently released a report revising the waiting periods for distressed borrowers with a derogatory credit event such as a foreclosure, bankruptcy, short sale, or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on their credit history to obtain a new loan.
For borrowers with a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on their record, Fannie Mae's new mandated minimum waiting period to become eligible for a new loan is four years. The time is shortened to two years if there are extenuating circumstances. According to Fannie Mae, extenuating circumstances are defined as "nonrecurring events that are beyond the borrower’s control that result in a sudden, significant, and prolonged reduction in income or a catastrophic increase in financial obligations."
If a borrower has a foreclosure on his or her credit record, the new minimum waiting period is seven years. Under extenuating circumstances, that period is shortened to three years with some additional requirements for up to seven years.
For those with a bankruptcy (chapter seven or 11), the waiting period is four years (two years with extenuating circumstances). For distressed borrowers with a chapter 13 bankruptcy, the required waiting period is now two years from the discharge date and four years from the dismissal date. If there are extenuating circumstances, the waiting time from the dismissal date is shortened to two years.
If there are multiple bankruptcy filings on a borrower's record, the waiting period for a new loan is five years if there has been more than one filing in the previous seven years.  Under extenuating circumstances, the waiting period is cut to three years from the most recent dismissal or discharge date.
Fannie Mae said in the report that it is "focused on helping lenders to provide access to mortgages for creditworthy borrowers while supporting sustainable homeownership" and that the new policy "provides opportunities for borrowers to obtain a loan to Fannie Mae’s maximum LTV (loan-to-value) sooner after the preforeclosure (short) sale or DIL."
The new policy is effective for loans with application dates on or after August 16, 2014.

Under the previous policy, the standard waiting period for borrowers with a derogatory credit event was two years with a maximum 80 percent LTV ratio; four years with a maximum 90 percent LTV ratio; or borrowers were eligible for a new loan after a standard seven-year waiting period. For borrowers with extenuating circumstances, the previous waiting period was two years with a maximum 90 percent LTV ratio.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Home Sales Typically Slow in Autumn Despite Economic Gains, Analyst Says

Source: DS News
Author: Brian Honea September 5, 2014

Lawrence Yun, chief economist and senior vice president of the National Association of Realtors (NAR), issued a statement on September 3 reporting that despite reports of more jobs, lower interest rates, and overall economic improvement, home sales are typically slow for the autumn months.
Yun said in his statement that the autumn and winter months have historically been unkind to the housing market. He reports an average decline of 16.4 percent in home sales month-over-month from August to September over the last 15 years. After holding steady in October, Yun said, home sales typically take another 8 percent dive in November. Figures for December usually match those in November before they plummet by 27 percent in January, then begin the slow rebound as winter turns to spring.
"Despite the weaker business opportunities in the upcoming autumn and winter months, media headlines on home sales are likely to show an upturn and possible strengthening conditions based on NAR home sales releases," Yun said in the statement. "What gives?"
The difference is in seasonal adjustments, Yun said. Most economic and housing data (including unemployment and GDP) reported in the media is seasonally adjusted in order to "better gauge an underlying economic trend of slight weakening or slight strengthening," he said.
Yun cited Myrtle Beach as an example of how seasonally adjusted employment data can make numbers appear more favorable than they actually are. He said the South Carolina beach town usually has about 15,000 more jobs available in summer than the rest of the year; if one summer there were only 6,000 more jobs available in Myrtle Beach, then the seasonally adjusted data would indicate that employment in the city was doing worse.
When applied to housing, if the annual average month-over-month decline in home sales from August to September is 16.4 percent and one year they decline only 8 percent in September, the media reports that that housing market has improved, Yun said. And seasonally adjusted data is commonly what consumers are exposed to through the media.

"The media just may be reporting improving home sales throughout the upcoming autumn and winter," Yun said. "This does not mean a home seller should be raising the listing price. Invariably, there are fewer home buyers in autumn and winter."

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Housing recovery pushes investors into more remote areas to find deals, with more looking to flip properties, C.A.R. survey finds

LOS ANGELES (Aug. 20) – Given the depletion of distressed homes on the market, investors are changing their strategy and are moving away from purchasing homes in more popular, urban areas in favor of more rural areas of the state where better deals can be found, according to a CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) investor survey.

In 2014, nearly half (45 percent) of investors said they purchased properties in such counties as Sacramento, San Joaquin, Fresno, Kern, Merced, and Tulare, up from 27 percent in 2013, C.A.R.’s “2014 Investor Survey” found.  Fifteen percent of investors purchased properties in Northern California in 2014, down from 27 percent in 2013, and 40 percent purchased properties in Southern California in 2014, down from 50 percent last year.

Additionally, with home prices on the rise, more investors are flipping properties instead of renting them.  In 2014, 28 percent of investors flipped the property, up from 20 percent last year. Fifty-eight percent of investors rented their properties in 2014, down from 73 percent in 2013.
More than eight out of 10 investors (83 percent) own other investment properties, with 7 percent owning more than 10 properties, 17 percent owning 6-10 properties, 47 percent owning 2-5 properties, and 12 percent owning one other property.

Among the reasons investors cited for buying now include profit potential (cited by 58 percent), good price (43 percent), location (26 percent), personal (21 percent), and low interest rates (14 percent).
The median sales price of an investment property in 2014 was $320,000, up 9.6 percent from $292,000 in 2013, reflecting increasing home prices and fewer available distressed properties over the past year.

Additional findings from C.A.R.’s “2014 Investor Survey” include:

• Reflecting the recovering housing market, the majority of investment properties purchased (70 percent) were equity sales, while 18 percent were short sales, and 12 percent were foreclosures.

• More than two-thirds (67 percent) of investors paid cash

• One-third of investors were foreign investors, with China, Mexico, Taiwan, and India being the top countries of origin.

• While most investors made minor or no repairs to the properties, the percentage of those who did major remodeling nearly doubled from 9 percent in 2013 to 17 percent this year.

• Investors spent more on remodeling costs in 2014, putting a median of $15,000 into the investment property, up 50 percent from $10,000 in 2013.

• Investors own an average of 8.3 properties in 2014, up from 6.5 properties last year.

• More than half of investors (55 percent) intend to keep the property less than six years.

California Investor Survey Slides (click links to open):

C.A.R.’s “2014 California Investor Survey” was conducted in May 2014 in an effort to learn more about the role of investors in the California housing market.  The survey was emailed to a random sample of REALTORS® throughout California who had worked with investors within the 12 months prior to May 2014.
For complete survey results, visit www.car.org/marketdata.

Leading the way...® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with 165,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles. 

Realtor in Thousand Oaks, Conejo Valley

I help people selling their homes get them sold quickly and almost always at 100% asking, even over in some markets. I save my real estate b...