Seventeen regions see improvement from previous quarter, with Napa, Merced, Marin, San Luis Obispo, Los Angeles, and Alameda counties leading the way
LOS ANGELES (May 12) – Lower interest rates and stabilizing home prices over the past year combined to make it easier for more Californians to purchase a home in the first quarter of 2015, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
The percentage of home buyers who could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California in first-quarter 2015 rose to 34 percent from the 31 percent recorded in the fourth quarter of 2014 and up from 33 percent in the first quarter a year ago, according to C.A.R.’s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI). This is the second consecutive quarter of improvements for the state and the highest level since second-quarter 2013. California’s housing affordability index hit a peak of 56 percent in the first quarter of 2012.
C.A.R.’s HAI measures the percentage of all households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The Index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.
Home buyers needed to earn a minimum annual income of $87,700 to qualify for the purchase of a $442,430 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the first quarter of 2015. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $2,190, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 3.97 percent.
The median home price was $418,570 in first-quarter 2014, and an annual income of $86,800 was needed to purchase a home at that price. The effective composite interest rate in first-quarter 2014 was 4.46 percent.
Key points from the first-quarter 2015 Housing Affordability report include:
• The affordability picture was promising when comparing quarterly changes. Seventeen regions had improvements, nine had declines, and two were unchanged. Compared to first-quarter 2014, 11 regions had improvements, 12 had declines, and six held steady.
• Marin, San Luis Obispo, and Monterey counties saw the largest year-to-year improvements in affordability, mainly due to increases in median annual household income and interest rate declines.
• Contra Costa, Solano, and San Joaquin counties experienced the largest year-to-year declines in affordability, resulting from double-digit home price growth.
• Affordability in Santa Clara and Sacramento counties held steady from the previous quarter, primarily due to moderate home price growth, which was offset by interest rate declines.
• Marin, Napa, and Santa Cruz counties had the largest quarter-to-quarter improvements in affordability, mainly due to increases in the median annual household income, and declines in the interest rate and prices.
• Contra Costa, Santa Barbara, and San Mateo counties posted the largest quarter-to-quarter declines in affordability as the result of strong home price gains.
Housing Affordability slides (click link to open)
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
| C.A.R. Region | Housing Affordability Index | Median Home Price | Monthly Payment Including Taxes & Insurance | Minimum Qualifying Income |
| CA SFH | 34 | $ 442,430 | $ 2,190 | $ 87,700 |
| CA Condo/Townhomes | 41 | $ 369,420 | $ 1,830 | $ 73,230 |
| Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 35 | $ 414,970 | $ 2,060 | $ 82,260 |
| Inland Empire | 47 | $ 281,000 | $ 1,390 | $ 55,700 |
| S.F. Bay Area | 23 | $ 748,330 | $ 3,710 | $ 148,330 |
| U.S. | 61 | $ 205,200 | $ 1,020 | $ 40,670 |
| S.F. Bay Area | ||||
| Alameda | 23 | $ 707,320 | $ 3,510 | $ 140,200 |
| Contra-Costa (Central County) | 21 | $ 755,760 | $ 3,750 | $ 149,810 |
| Marin | 19 | $ 1,036,050 | $ 5,130 | $ 205,370 |
| Napa | 34 | $ 492,550 | $ 2,440 | $ 97,630 |
| San Francisco | 12 | $ 1,175,850 | $ 5,830 | $ 233,080 |
| San Mateo | 14 | $ 1,202,000 | $ 5,960 | $ 238,260 |
| Santa Clara | 22 | $ 900,000 | $ 4,460 | $ 178,400 |
| Solano | 48 | $ 337,000 | $ 1,670 | $ 66,800 |
| Sonoma | 31 | $ 489,650 | $ 2,430 | $ 97,060 |
| Southern California | ||||
| Los Angeles | 31 | $ 434,710 | $ 2,150 | $ 86,170 |
| Orange County | 22 | $ 685,680 | $ 3,400 | $ 135,920 |
| Riverside County | 42 | $ 322,620 | $ 1,600 | $ 63,950 |
| San Bernardino | 58 | $ 212,300 | $ 1,050 | $ 42,080 |
| San Diego | 28 | $ 510,330 | $ 2,530 | $ 101,160 |
| Ventura | 28 | $ 583,820 | $ 2,890 | $ 115,720 |
| Central Coast | ||||
| Monterey | 29 | $ 465,000 | $ 2,300 | $ 92,170 |
| San Luis Obispo | 30 | $ 492,390 | $ 2,440 | $ 97,600 |
| Santa Barbara | 18 | $ 680,550 | $ 3,370 | $ 134,900 |
| Santa Cruz | 22 | $ 695,000 | $ 3,440 | $ 137,760 |
| Central Valley | ||||
| Fresno | 51 | $ 212,200 | $ 1,050 | $ 42,060 |
| Kings County | 62 | $ 186,000 | $ 920 | $ 36,870 |
| Madera | 51 | $ 212,500 | $ 1,050 | $ 42,120 |
| Merced | 60 | $ 177,240 | $ 880 | $ 35,130 |
| Placer County | 46 | $ 379,080 | $ 1,880 | $ 75,140 |
| Sacramento | 49 | $ 275,810 | $ 1,370 | $ 54,670 |
| San Joaquin | 39 | $ 269,400 | $ 1,340 | $ 53,400 |
| Stanislaus | 43 | $ 237,200 | $ 1,180 | $ 47,020 |
| Tulare | 57 | $ 175,930 | $ 870 | $ 34,870 |
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
| STATE/REGION/COUNTY | Q1 2015 | Q4 2014 | Q1 2014 | ||
| CA SFH | 34 | 31 | 33 | ||
| CA Condo/Townhomes | 41 | 39 | 41 | ||
| Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 35 | 34 | 35 | ||
| Inland Empire | 47 | 47 | 47 | ||
| S.F. Bay Area | 23 | 21 | 23 | ||
| U.S. | 61 | 59 | 61 | ||
| S.F. Bay Area | |||||
| Alameda | 23 | 20 | 22 | ||
| Contra-Costa (Central County) | 21 | 23 | 24 | ||
| Marin | 19 | 15 | 15 | ||
| Napa | 34 | 24 | 28 | ||
| San Francisco | 12 | 11 | r | 13 | r |
| San Mateo | 14 | 15 | 14 | ||
| Santa Clara | 22 | 22 | 22 | ||
| Solano | 48 | 50 | 53 | ||
| Sonoma | 31 | 29 | 29 | ||
| Southern California | |||||
| Los Angeles | 31 | 28 | 31 | ||
| Orange County | 22 | 21 | 21 | ||
| Riverside County | 42 | 41 | 42 | ||
| San Bernardino | 58 | 57 | 61 | ||
| San Diego | 28 | 27 | 27 | ||
| Ventura | 28 | 29 | 29 | ||
| Central Coast | |||||
| Monterey | 29 | 27 | 23 | ||
| San Luis Obispo | 30 | 26 | 24 | ||
| Santa Barbara | 18 | 21 | 18 | ||
| Santa Cruz | 22 | 17 | 20 | ||
| Central Valley | |||||
| Fresno | 51 | 53 | 54 | ||
| Kings County | 62 | 64 | 64 | ||
| Madera | 51 | 50 | r | 54 | r |
| Merced | 60 | 53 | 58 | ||
| Placer County | 46 | 45 | 45 | ||
| Sacramento | 49 | 49 | 50 | ||
| San Joaquin | 39 | 41 | 42 | ||
| Stanislaus | 43 | 44 | 46 | ||
| Tulare | 57 | 56 | 59 |
r = revised
Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than 175,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
