Friday, November 15, 2013

Delinquency and Foreclosure Rates Continue to Plummet

Source:  MBA

The serious delinquency rate, the percentage of loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure, was 5.65 percent, a decrease of 23 basis points from last quarter, and a decrease of 138 basis points from the third quarter of last year.  However, as with past quarters’ results, the reported improvement in the seriously delinquent percentages may be slightly less than stated because one large specialty servicer that has received a number of loan transfers does not participate in the MBA survey.

Compared with the third quarter of 2012, the foreclosure inventory rate decreased 62 basis points for prime fixed loans, 328 basis points for prime ARM loans, 37 basis points for subprime fixed, 285 basis points for subprime ARM loans, 72 basis points for FHA loans and 40 basis points for VA loans.
 Data are from a proprietary paid subscription service of MBA and are provided to the media as a courtesy, solely for use as background reference.  No part of the data may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise.  Permission is granted to news media to reproduce limited data in text articles.  Data may not be reproduced in tabular or graphical form without MBA’s prior written consent. The above data were obtained in cooperation with the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), which produces the National Delinquency Survey (NDS).  The NDS, which has been conducted since 1953, covers 41 million loans on one- to four- unit residential properties, representing approximately 88 percent of all “first-lien” residential mortgage loans outstanding in the United States.  This quarter's loan count saw an increase of 80,000 loans from the previous quarter, and a decrease of 990,000 loans from one year ago.  Loans surveyed were reported by approximately 120 lenders, including mortgage bankers, commercial banks, and thrifts.


WASHINGTON, D.C. (November 7, 2013) — The delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties decreased to a seasonally adjusted rate of 6.41 percent of all loans outstanding at the end of the third quarter of 2013, the lowest level since the second quarter of 2008.  The delinquency rate dropped 55 basis points from the previous quarter, and 99 basis points from one year ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) National Delinquency Survey.
The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure.  The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the third quarter was 3.08 percent down 25 basis points from the second quarter and 99 basis points lower than one year ago.  This was the lowest foreclosure inventory rate seen since 2008.
The percentage of loans on which foreclosure actions were started during the third quarter decreased to 0.61 percent from 0.64 percent, a decrease of three basis points, and the lowest level since early 2007.
The combined percentage of loans at least one payment past due or in foreclosure was the lowest in five years, decreasing to 9.75 percent on a non-seasonally adjusted basis, 38 basis points lower than last quarter and 196 basis points lower than the same quarter one year ago.
VA loans had their lowest delinquency rate since 1980, in part because about 40 percent of the VA portfolio has been originated since the end of 2007 and the home price crash. 
“The degree to which the mortgage delinquency and foreclosure problem has changed over the last five years is perhaps best illustrated by the fact that last quarter New Jersey led the nation in the increase in the percentage of foreclosure actions filed, followed by Delaware, Maryland and Indiana.  While Florida still leads the nation in the percentage of loans in foreclosure, that percentage is falling.  In contrast, New York and New Jersey were the only two states that saw an increase in the percentages of loans in foreclosure,” said Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s Chief Economist and SVP of Research and Education. 
“States with judicial foreclosure systems still account for most of the loans in foreclosure.  While the percentages of loans in foreclosure dropped in both judicial and nonjudicial states, the average rate for judicial states was 5.28 percent, more than triple the average rate of 1.66 percent for nonjudicial states.
“A few major points need to be highlighted.  To begin, many mortgage servicers are already reducing their staffs that handled delinquent loans and foreclosures and we expect that trend to continue as the numbers continue to fall. 
“Also, while home prices have shown some considerable improvement, in only a small number of states are they back above their pre-2007 levels.  This is noteworthy because roughly three-quarters of all seriously delinquent loans were originated in 2007 or earlier.  So even if the economy continues to improve, those loans are more likely to proceed to foreclosure in the event of a divorce, illness or loss of a job because of lack of borrower equity.  This will keep the foreclosure rates above historical norms for a few more years despite the strong credit standards of recent vintages.
“Finally, mortgage delinquencies are the result of local economic conditions, not the cause of them.  Clearly local home price bubbles and the temporary injections from cash out refinancing and speculation temporarily boosted some areas and made the subsequent economic crash even worse, but we are now at a point where local economic growth and population movements will determine housing demand and mortgage performance.  Those areas with the weaker climates for economic growth will see home value and delinquency problems that are beyond the abilities of the mortgage industry and housing regulators to impact in a meaningful way,” Brinkmann said.
Change from last quarter (second quarter of 2013)
On a seasonally adjusted basis, the overall delinquency rate decreased for all loan types.  The seasonally adjusted delinquency rate decreased 46 basis points to 3.35 percent for prime fixed loans and decreased 80 basis points to 5.97 percent for prime ARM loans.  For subprime loans, the delinquency rate decreased 179 basis points to 19.20 percent for subprime fixed loans and 153 basis points to 21.46 percent for subprime ARM loans.  The delinquency rates for VA loans fell by 73 basis points to 5.41 percent and the FHA delinquency rate declined by 97 basis points to 10.06 percent.
The non-seasonally adjusted percent of loans in foreclosure, also known as the foreclosure inventory rate, decreased from last quarter to 3.08 percent.  The foreclosure inventory rate for prime fixed loans decreased 15 basis points to 1.72 percent and the rate for prime ARM loans decreased 91 basis points from last quarter to 4.54 percent.  For subprime loans, the rate for subprime fixed loans decreased 90 basis points to 8.99 percent and the rate for subprime ARM loans decreased 115 basis points to 16.45 percent.  The foreclosure inventory rate for FHA loans decreased 32 basis points to 3.36 while the rate for VA loans decreased 7 basis points to 1.81 percent.
The non-seasonally adjusted foreclosure starts rate decreased 21 basis points for prime ARM loans to 0.60 percent, 12 basis points for subprime fixed to 1.86 percent, 34 basis points for subprime ARM loans to 2.91 percent, four basis points for FHA loans to 0.77 percent and three basis points for VA loans to 0.44 percent.  The foreclosure start rate remained unchanged from last quarter for prime fixed loans at 0.33 percent.
Change from last year (third quarter of 2012)
Given the challenges in interpreting the true seasonal effects in these data when comparing quarter to quarter changes, it is important to highlight the year over year changes of the non-seasonally adjusted results.
Over the past year, the non-seasonally adjusted foreclosure starts rate decreased 21 basis points for prime fixed loans, 87 basis points for prime ARM loans, five basis points for subprime fixed, 49 basis points for subprime ARM loans, 35 basis points for FHA loans and 13 basis points for VA loans.
As a result of the large volume of servicing transfers, there may be volatility in the results from quarter to quarter for particular loan types as servicers reclassify loans.   MBA actively tracking these transfers to maintain the best and most consistent sample coverage possible.
If you are not a member of the media and would like to purchase the survey, please visit www.mortgagebankers.org/NDS or e-mail MBAResearch@MortgageBankers.org.
© 2013 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA).  All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted.
The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) is the national association representing the real estate finance industry, an industry that employs more than 280,000 people in virtually every community in the country. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the association works to ensure the continued strength of the nation's residential and commercial real estate markets; to expand homeownership and extend access to affordable housing to all Americans. MBA promotes fair and ethical lending practices and fosters professional excellence among real estate finance employees through a wide range of educational programs and a variety of publications. Its membership of over 2,200 companies includes all elements of real estate finance: mortgage companies, mortgage brokers, commercial banks, thrifts, Wall Street conduits, life insurance companies and others in the mortgage lending field. For additional information, visit MBA's Web site:   www.mba.org.

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION RELEASES OCTOBER HOUSING SCORECARD

Source:  HUD.gov

Providence, Rhode Island housing market continues to show signs of significant improvement
WASHINGTON- The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury today released the October edition of the Obama Administration's Housing Scorecard – a comprehensive report on the nation’s housing market. The latest data show important progress across many key indicators—as home prices, purchases of new homes, and sales of existing homes continue to show strong annual gains—although officials caution that the overall recovery remains fragile.The full Housing Scorecard is available online atwww.hud.gov/scorecard.
“As indicated in the October housing scorecard, the Administration continues to work to stabilize the housing market and help responsible homeowners get back on their feet,” said HUD Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Affairs Kurt Usowski. “With homeowners’ equity at its highest level since 2007 and home prices increasing steadily, it is clear that we are moving in the right direction.  As our housing market regains stability, it seems the time is ripe for private capital to begin taking a larger role in the housing finance system.”
“The Administration’s Making Home Affordable program continues to provide assistance to struggling homeowners, with more than 1.2 million homeowners receiving permanent modifications through HAMP,” said Tim Massad, Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability.  “In addition, the standards set through the program have helped change the industry and helped millions more avoid foreclosure.” The October Housing Scorecard features key data on the health of the housing market and the impact of the Administration’s foreclosure prevention programs, including:
  • The Administration’s foreclosure mitigation programs continue to provide relief for millions of homeowners as the recovery from the housing crisis continues. Over 1.8 million homeowner assistance actions have taken place through the Making Home Affordable Program, including more than 1.2 million permanent modifications through the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). The Administration’s programs continue to encourage improved standards and processes in the industry, with HOPE Now lenders offering families and individuals more than 3.8 million proprietary modifications through August. 
  • Homeowners in HAMP continue to benefit from meaningful payment relief, increasing their long-term likelihood of avoiding foreclosure.  As of September, more than 1.2 million homeowners have received a permanent modification through HAMP, saving approximately $547 on their mortgage payments each month- an almost 40 percent savings from their previous payment. This represents a total estimated savings of $22.9 billion in monthly mortgage payments, since the inception of the program. In September, 72 percent of eligible non-GSE mortgages benefited from principal reduction with their HAMP modification. Homeowners currently in HAMP permanent modifications with some form of principal reduction have been granted an estimated $12.1 billion in principal reduction. View the Making Home Affordable Program Report with data through September 2013.
Also featured this month in the Administration’s Housing Scorecard is a regional spotlight on market strength in the Providence, Rhode Island area. Like many areas across the country, the economic and housing market conditions in the Providence area are improving, but the foreclosure crisis has taken its toll. The Administration’s broad approach to stabilize the housing market has been a real help to homeowners in Providence and the surrounding cities.
“As the housing market continues to strengthen nationwide, Providence is also showing signs of significant improvement,” said Usowski. “As this Regional Spotlight reports, from the launch of the Administration’s assistance programs in April 2009 through the end of August 2013, nearly 26,800 homeowners received mortgage assistance in the Providence metropolitan area.  This is a step in the right direction but we still have much to do to repair the damage caused by unsustainable lending in Providence prior to the crisis, and to help the continuing recovery.”
The Housing Scorecard Regional Spotlight features data on the health of the Providence housing market and impact of efforts to help homeowners at the local level including:

  • Economic and housing market conditions in the Providence MSA are improving.  The share of mortgages that remain underwater has dropped to 17.3 percent as of the second quarter of 2013, down from 21.5 percent a year earlier. Jobs in the MSA have been increasing at an average annual rate of 4,025, or 0.7 percent, from the first quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2013. The Administration’s broad approach to stabilize the housing market has contributed to the improvements as more than 15,600 homeowners received mortgage assistance in the Providence area between April 2009 and August 2013 through the HAMP and FHA loss mitigation programs. An additional 11,200 proprietary mortgage modifications were made during this time through HOPE Now Alliance servicers.  Furthermore, the City of Providence and the State of Rhode Island have benefitted from $25 million in funding from the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, and $79 million from the Hardest Hit Fund program.
     
  • The National Mortgage Settlement is continuing to provide relief for those in Providence and throughout the state of Rhode Island.  Under the landmark National Mortgage Servicing Settlement, more than 2,000 Rhode Island homeowners had benefitted from over $150 million in consumer relief as of June 30, 2013.  1,182 of those borrowers, 56% of those helped, received an average of $72,586 in principal reduction on their first and second lien mortgages to help them stay in their homes.  In addition, 317 borrowers who were current on their mortgage but too far underwater for a traditional refinancing were able to refinance and save an average of $41,779 over the life of their loans. Nationwide, the settlement has provided more than $51 billion in consumer relief benefits to more than 640,000 families, including over $25 billion in first and second lien principal reduction for 319,559 borrowers.  That is in addition to the $2.5 billion in payments to participating states and $1.5 billion in direct payments to borrowers who were foreclosed upon between 2008 and 2011.

*Due to the government shutdown, the Obama Administration did not publish the September housing scorecard.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Housing market another battlefield for U.S. Vets

Source: The San Francisco Chronicle

New data reveals that our nation’s veterans face unique challenges when it comes to achieving homeownership. When members of our military leave active duty and return to the United States, in most cases they do not return to a home they own. In fact, only 18 percent of veterans return to a home they already own at the end of their service, and only one-third of military families report actually looking for a home within a year of return from active duty, according to the CENTURY 21 Harris poll.

Making sense of the story


·        As military service members return from duty and transition to civilian life, 93 percent ofveterans indicate that homeownership is important to them

·       The top road blocks for veterans are the price of homes (36 percent); an inability to come up with a down payment (31 percent); and personal savings (28 percent)

·       Physical or mental health problems create further disadvantages for veterans when it comes to finding employment and a home. It is projected that one in every four homeless persons in this country is a veteran. According to January 2012 figures, there were over 62,000 homeless veterans

·       The unemployment rate among veterans is 16 percent, which is more than double the nation’s average unemployment rate

·       Seventy-five percent say that owning a home is one of the most important things for a soldier returning home

·       Among the reasons that becoming a homeowner is so significant to veterans are a desire to have their own residence (73 percent), to establish a household (43 percent), and to achieve financial security (36 percent). In addition, the majority of veterans (88 percent) indicated that owning a home makes them feel safer

Read the full story
http://blog.sfgate.com/ontheblock/2013/11/11/housing-market-another-battlefield-for-u-s-vets/

Cote d’Azure named as top place for the world’s wealthiest leisure home buyers

Source: Property Wire THURSDAY, 10 OCTOBER 2013 

Image Image The Côte d’Azur in the south of France has claimed the number one spot in a new list of the world’s most successful luxury residential property locations where wealthy buyers want to buy a place to spend their leisure time. With the price of a typical five bedroom property in the Côte d’Azur now exceeding $28.5 million, this sought after region is the ultimate and most expensive for home transactions among the ultra wealthy, attracting buyers from across Europe, North America and most actively at present, from the Middle East and Russia. It comes top in the Candy GPS report by Candy & Candy, Savills World Research and Deutsche Asset and Wealth Management and identifies the top 20 prime leisure locations where the global super wealthy are purchasing additional properties. Over 60 international leisure hotspots were identified in the research and analysed based on global reach, real estate values, exclusivity and luxury tourism. Two further European locations, Sardinia’s Costa Smerelda and Monaco also feature in the top five. Costa Smeralda boasts a vast luxury property portfolio across its 35 mile coastline and in Monaco there is currently a five bedroom villa on the market for €58 million. Several Caribbean locations feature in the top 20. The small and exclusive island of St Barts ranks third overall, where prices have been sustained by the scarcity of stock at the very top end of the market and the continuing influx of buyers from new sources. The much larger island of Barbados came sixth in the world ranking, partly due to the high volume of British buyers now purchasing leisure properties. The new and emerging Caribbean resort of Canouan, part of St Vincent, also features in the top 20 following significant infrastructure investment and major upgrades to its airport, that have brought more of the global wealthy within its reach and with property prices now average $6 million for a five bedroom villa. Away from the sun, the ski resorts of Aspen and Vail in the United States and Courchevel in France ranked highly. Switzerland’s premier resorts of St Moritz, Gstaad and Verbier also featured in the top 20, where prices are considerably higher than Courchevel, reflecting the profile of their buyers and the relatively strong Swiss franc. Historically the Swiss Alps market has been dominated by British and other Northern European buyers, but the last few years have seen increasing investment from Asian buyers. Asking prices for chalets in these exclusive ski resorts are more than $1,200 per square foot. With its beachside homes, Sylt, the northernmost island in Germany, has long been associated with the German jet set. In Africa, the Cape wine regions are emerging as a luxury second home destination, while the Seychelles are seeing increasing second home buying activity. Russian wealth is a key driver for many of the luxury locations. The report says that buyers from Russia are primarily acquiring properties in the Mediterranean, the South of France, Italy and increasingly in emerging destinations in the Eastern Mediterranean such as Montenegro. They are also particularly active in the United States and the Caribbean. Middle Eastern buyers are also becoming more active in the global additional home market and are already the dominant buyer group in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. They are also buying in key luxury Mediterranean resorts and have been high profile investors in Marbella and the Costa Smeralda. In Asia luxury home buying is concentrated in urban centres and in just a handful of leisure locations such as the Thai resorts of Phuket and Koh Samui, Bali in Indonesia, and Niseko in north Japan, which is popular for skiing. Much of the ‘additional home’ buying activity in the region comes from Europeans, Americans and Australians working or doing business in Asia. Hainan Island is emerging as a high end destination for China's wealthy buyers. Meanwhile, recent Chinese purchases of Bordeaux vineyards suggest a potential new wave of lifestyle purchases by this buying group. ‘The growth of Ultra High Net Worth Individuals has fuelled demand for prime secondary residences in exclusive leisure enclaves around the world,’ said Nick Candy, chief executive officer of Candy & Candy. ‘In the same way that we have seen exponential real estate growth in global cities over recent years, we expect to see the same level of growth and property values replicated in the top luxury leisure enclaves where the world’s super rich are choosing to purchase additional homes,’ he added. According to Yolande Barnes, director of Savills World Research, who conducted the analysis, the motives for buying in any one of the exclusive enclaves listed in the research are as many and varied as the people that inhabit them. ‘UHNWIs operate on a truly global basis and their choice of location for additional homes is a footloose one based on their passions, interests, values and perceptions of different places,’ she explained. The report also outlines the financial complexities of UHNWI leisure property purchases in today’s economic climate, with cultural differences, legal and tax systems, and financing all complex factors in the process. ‘Location, square footage and finish are the obvious driver’s of a property’s value but at the luxury end of the market, there are other factors to consider. Buyers need to have a strong understanding of the legal and tax considerations to ensure they are actually getting what they are paying for. These considerations can vary significantly depending on a country’s regulatory, tax and legal landscape,’ said Balaji Prassana, head of lending and deposits for Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management. ‘It is also important to consider macro-economic factors when buying a leisure property in the luxury sector, especially when some destinations across Europe are going through periods of economic upheaval, with not insignificant consequences for UHNWIs,’ Prassana. Barnes pointed out that ultimately, it is the combination of global wealth creation and fashion that will determine the next playgrounds of the rich and famous. ‘It will be interesting to see whether Asian buyers start to adopt the European and North American preferences for sun, sport and skiing or whether they will continue to cling to more urban centres for rest and recreation. We may even see new forms of luxury enclave emerge from Asia in the future,’ she added.

Rihanna Renting Out Los Angeles Home For $65,000 A Month




Rihanna is renting out her mod home.
RiRi isn’t too keen on Lala Land.
The sexy Barbadian songstress has left the Left Coast for New York City, where she recently rented a $39,000-a-month condo at 129 Lafayette in the booming lower Manhattan neighborhood between Soho and Chinatown.
Now it looks like Rihanna has no interest in paying for properties on two U.S. coasts, so she listed her Pacific Palisades home for $65,000 a month.
Why all the cross-country shuffling of residences?
Rihanna has only owned the Los Angeles area property for about a year, having paid $12 million for the 9,595-square-foot pleasure palace. However, after several incidents with break-ins and intruders, the Grammy-Award-winning singer has been left with a cold feeling about sunny Tinsletown.
It was definitely a good time for a new crash pad. The West-to-East shift for Rihanna seems near completion, once she finds a tenant ready to pay the freight on her massive California home, where the rent is scheduled to escalate to $100,00 per month come January.
What would Rihanna’s tenant get for that eye-popping rental price? How about “unmatched privacy and serenity” in what is called a “resort-like” estate is situated at the end of a long, private drive.
Built new in 2012, the home has 7 bedrooms, 9 baths and extra-large living spaces with 14-foot ceilings. Several high-end features can be found throughout the home, including media and game rooms and “smart home” technology that controls temperature, fireplaces, security and sound. Outdoor features include a sun deck with fire pit and barbecue, as well as an infinity pool with spa.
Here’s hoping RiRi can settle into her NYC digs and take a break from non-stop touring and recording and real estate snafus. Her previous foray into the Los Angeles real estate market turned immediately sour when she wound uphaving to sue the contractor and real estate agent for not disclosing water damage. She eventually did sell the home, leading to the purchase of the Pacific Palisades property.
Now RiRi has left L.A., hoping that in a city of 8 million people, she can find the peace and anonymity she’s been looking for. It helps that her new rental at 129 Lafayette comes with a doorman and a private elevator to sweep her up to her huge, 4,660-square-foot penthouse. If she likes it up there with views of the Empire State Building from her 2,400-square-foot deck, she can stay. The place is for sale for $14.6 million. See photos of her new New York pad on the Zillow Blog.
See more photos of Rihanna’s home for rent here.

Current Sales & Price Statistics


September-13
Median Sold Price of Existing Single-Family HomesSales
State/Region/County
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12MTM% ChgYTY% ChgMTM% ChgYTY% Chg
CA SFH (SAAR)
$428,810$441,330$344,760r-2.8%24.4%-5.1%-2.6%
CA Condo/Townhomes
$344,210$343,400$264,800r0.2%30.0%-14.7%13.4%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area
$390,800$394,550$318,470-1.0%22.7%-13.5%-0.8%
Inland Empire
$252,100$245,330$198,2702.8%27.1%-15.4%-1.7%
S.F. Bay Area
$687,260$704,830$554,450-2.5%24.0%-15.9%3.6%
S.F. Bay Area
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12MTM% ChgYTY% ChgMTM% ChgYTY% Chg
Alameda
$640,340$654,060$491,670-2.1%30.2%-20.8%11.8%
Contra-Costa (Central County)
$770,450$808,560$655,340-4.7%17.6%-15.2%4.8%
Marin
$893,140$987,740$769,230-9.6%16.1%-14.7%10.7%
Napa
$477,270$565,970$381,670-15.7%25.0%-8.5%-1.8%
San Francisco
$858,330$871,480$678,080-1.5%26.6%-15.6%12.9%
San Mateo
$908,000$980,000$779,000-7.3%16.6%-18.5%4.9%
Santa Clara
$778,000$805,000$650,000-3.4%19.7%-10.9%3.9%
Solano
$286,220$295,890$196,980-3.3%45.3%-16.8%-12.5%
Sonoma
$455,850$453,790$368,5900.5%23.7%-19.9%-2.3%
Southern California
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12MTM% ChgYTY% ChgMTM% ChgYTY% Chg
Los Angeles
$459,020$444,950$373,0203.2%23.1%-10.2%1.3%
Orange County
$672,680$664,580$561,8301.2%19.7%-15.9%-1.6%
Riverside County
$293,560$290,030$228,9001.2%28.2%-12.8%-5.6%
San Bernardino
$185,860$183,240$150,0901.4%23.8%-19.2%5.4%
San Diego
$490,130$482,470$404,8801.6%21.1%-20.5%-6.2%
Ventura
$550,000$555,560$432,790-1.0%27.1%-15.9%-6.1%
Central Coast
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12MTM% ChgYTY% ChgMTM% ChgYTY% Chg
Monterey
$422,500$407,000$330,0003.8%28.0%-1.8%-1.8%
San Luis Obispo
$495,350$477,420$424,3903.8%16.7%-19.9%-4.2%
Santa Barbara
$692,930$625,000$415,380r10.9%66.8%-8.1%18.2%
Santa Cruz
$639,500$629,000$560,0001.7%14.2%-17.1%-13.6%
Central Valley
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12MTM% ChgYTY% ChgMTM% ChgYTY% Chg
Fresno
$185,830$184,000$159,1301.0%16.8%-13.0%0.3%
Glenn
$134,000$135,000$163,330-0.7%-18.0%16.7%31.3%
Kern (Bakersfield)
$195,000$199,400r$150,000-2.2%30.0%-6.1%3.2%
Kings County
$168,460$184,000$156,670-8.4%7.5%-3.5%25.8%
Madera
$190,000$170,000$120,00011.8%58.3%-40.5%-26.7%
Merced
$178,570$155,880$138,57014.6%28.9%-11.2%-3.1%
Placer County
$365,290$361,830$308,5901.0%18.4%-8.2%1.6%
Sacramento
$255,390$257,660$180,830-0.9%41.2%-12.6%-4.5%
San Benito
$428,950$387,000$311,00010.8%37.9%-24.0%-22.4%
San Joaquin
$242,370$231,390$179,7804.7%34.8%-4.6%1.0%
Stanislaus
$194,890$203,120$151,500-4.1%28.6%-15.7%-2.4%
Tulare
$163,500$158,460$137,060r3.2%19.3%-4.7%-12.3%
Other Counties in California
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12MTM% ChgYTY% ChgMTM% ChgYTY% Chg
Amador
$252,780$211,110r$196,67019.7%28.5%-13.5%-10.0%
Butte County
$250,000$281,820$207,140-11.3%20.7%-24.2%-6.0%
Calaveras
$215,500$220,000NA-2.0%NA-16.5%NA
Del Norte
$136,500$100,000NA36.5%NA33.3%NA
El Dorado County
$334,900$355,840$279,170-5.9%20.0%-20.3%-12.4%
Humboldt
$251,090$247,220$223,6101.6%12.3%5.3%33.7%
Lake County
$150,000$153,330$146,670-2.2%2.3%-20.5%0.0%
Tuolumne
$207,690$215,280$155,710-3.5%33.4%-6.8%4.6%
Mendocino
$285,710$276,670$211,3603.3%35.2%-50.0%-27.7%
Shasta
$190,500$203,650$166,670-6.5%14.3%-30.0%-8.8%
Siskiyou County
$155,000$140,000$140,00010.7%10.7%-4.3%46.7%
Sutter
$204,700$202,000NA1.3%NA-1.3%NA
Tehama
$150,000$146,670$127,5002.3%17.6%-20.6%-22.9%
Yolo
$331,030$320,310$238,8903.3%38.6%-27.7%-17.6%
Yuba
$170,000$186,000NA-8.6%NA-11.5%NA



September 2013

Unsold Inventory And Median Time On Market (pdf file
)

Regional/County Sales Data and Condo Sales Data Not Seasonally Adjusted
September-13
Unsold Inventory IndexMedian Time on Market
State/Region/County
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12
CA SFH (SAAR)
3.6
3.1

3.7

29.6
28.8

39.2
r
CA Condo/Townhomes
3.1
2.6

3.6

29.7
28.3

46.7

Los Angeles Metropolitan Area
3.6
3.1

3.8

37.4
36.7

47.2

Inland Empire
3.7
3.1

3.8

31.8
34.3

45.3

S.F. Bay Area
2.8
2.4

3.2

37.4
35.9

40.4












S.F. Bay Area
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12
Alameda
2.6
2.1

2.6

49.2
48.7

59.2

Contra-Costa (Central County)
2.5
2.3

2.4

49.2
49.3

63.6

Marin
3.8
3.0

4.7

43.2
40.6

51.6

Napa
5.0
2.0

5.7

53.1
57.3

67.6

San Francisco
3.4
2.8

4.3

23.7
25.4

29.4

San Mateo
2.6
2.1

3.0

20.1
19.7

21.0

Santa Clara
2.1
2.1

2.3

20.1
19.0

20.8

Solano
3.1
2.7

3.7

35.4
32.1

55.5

Sonoma
3.6
2.9

4.3

48.2
46.8

61.5

Sourthern California
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12
Los Angeles
3.4
2.9

3.7

33.0
31.1

42.8

Orange County
3.8
3.3

4.1

51.0
46.3

56.1

Riverside County
3.8
3.2

3.6

32.2
36.6

46.3

San Bernardino
3.6
3.0

4.1

31.2
29.8

43.7

San Diego
4.2
3.4

4.3

25.5
24.4

40.0

Ventura
3.7
3.2

4.3

45.6
46.9

55.4

Central Coast
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12
Monterey
4.0
4.0

4.2

26.6
23.5

28.2

San Luis Obispo
5.4
4.4

5.1

29.0
26.7

51.8

Santa Barbara
3.6
3.5

5.1

37.2
38.3

55.0

Santa Cruz
3.8
3.2

3.1

22.8
24.8

34.6

Central Valley
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12
Fresno
4.4
3.7

4.7

25.0
23.1

26.8

Glenn
4.5
4.7

3.8

45.5
40.7

31.0

Kern (Bakersfield)
2.7
2.6

3.9
r
15.0
16.0

23.0

Kings County
3.0
2.9

4.1

37.2
50.3

37.2

Madera
5.0
2.4

3.5

27.6
25.4

43.9

Merced
3.2
2.9

3.4

21.9
24.2

27.8

Placer County
3.2
3.1

2.8

22.1
20.8

26.5

Sacramento
3.0
2.7

2.4

20.4
19.7

24.1

San Benito
3.4
2.8

3.0

19.4
22.3

23.9

San Joaquin
2.8
2.8

2.9

19.5
19.5

23.1

Stanislaus
2.7
2.4

2.6

20.1
19.6

24.4

Tulare
4.2
4.1

4.0

24.1
23.3

25.2
r
Other Counties in California
Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12Sep-13Aug-13Sep-12
Amador
4.4
3.9
r
5.6

43.1
53.8
r
82.8

Butte County
5.5
4.2

4.6

37.2
25.6

41.2

Calaveras
6.0
5.2

NA

64.0
53.0

NA

Del Norte
8.8
13.1

NA

96.0
107.0

NA

El Dorado County
4.9
4.1

3.8
r
34.2
36.2

48.1

Humboldt
5.1
5.3

6.3

32.9
27.9

64.6

Lake County
5.7
4.9

6.7

74.2
91.0

64.2

Tuolumne
6.5
6.3

6.7

51.1
57.8

58.9

Mendocino
10.8
5.6

7.6

85.9
87.1

93.4

Shasta
5.7
4.1

4.7

38.4
28.0

37.8

Siskiyou County
8.9
9.1

13.2

57.6
71.2

61.0

Sutter
2.7
2.4

NA

14.0
11.0

NA

Tehama
7.6
6.3

6.9

36.4
41.4

52.8

Yolo
3.6
2.7

2.7

21.0
18.8

32.3

Yuba
2.9
2.6

NA

16.0
10.5

NA


*   Los Angeles Metropolitan Area is a 5-county region that includes Los Angeles County, Orange
    County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Ventura County
*   S.F. Bay Area has been redefined to include the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa,
    Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma
*   Inland Empire includes Riverside County and San Bernardino County
*   r = revised
*   MTM%c Chg = Percent change from prior month
*   YTY% Chg = Percent change from prior year

Regional/County sales data and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted.
The MLS median price and sales data for detached homes are generated from a survey of more
than 90 associations of REALTORS® and MLSs throughout the state, representing 90 percent of
the market. County sales data are not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence
home sales. MLS median price and sales data for condominiums are based on a survey of more
than 60 associations. The median price for both detached homes an condominiums represents
closed escrows. Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as changes in the cost of a
standard home. Median prices can be influenced by changes in cost and in the characteristics
and size of homes sold. Due to low sales volume in some areas, median price changes may
exhibit unusual fluctuation. C.A.R.’s data has been standardized to reflect county-level statistics.

Realtor in Thousand Oaks, Conejo Valley

I help people selling their homes get them sold quickly and almost always at 100% asking, even over in some markets. I save my real estate b...