• Thirty-one percent of California households could afford to purchase the $511,360 median-priced home in the fourth quarter, unchanged from third-quarter 2016 and up from 30 percent in fourth-quarter 2015.
• A minimum annual income of $100,800 was needed to make monthly payments of $2,520, including principal, interest, and taxes on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at a 3.91 percent interest rate.
• Forty percent of home buyers were able to purchase the $413,700 median-priced condo or townhome. An annual income of $81,550 was required to make a monthly payment of $2,040.
LOS ANGELES (Feb. 9) – Rising wages and seasonal price declines held California’s housing affordability steady in fourth-quarter 2016, even while interest rates rose moderately, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
The percentage of home buyers who could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California in fourth-quarter 2016 remained at 31 percent, unchanged from the third quarter of 2016 but was up from 30 percent in fourth-quarter 2015, according to C.A.R.’s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI). This is the 15th consecutive quarter that the index has been below 40 percent and is near the mid-2008 low level of 29 percent. California’s housing affordability index hit a peak of 56 percent in the third quarter of 2012.
C.A.R.’s HAI measures the percentage of all households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The Index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.
Home buyers needed to earn a minimum annual income of $100,800 to qualify for the purchase of a $511,360 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the fourth quarter of 2016. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $2,520, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 3.91 percent. The effective composite interest rate in third-quarter 2016 was 3.76 percent and 4.07 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015.
Homes were slightly more affordable in fourth-quarter 2016 compared to fourth-quarter 2015, when the affordability index stood at 30 and the median home price was $484,710. An annual income of $96,980 was needed to make monthly payments of $2,420.
The affordability of condominiums and townhomes also was flat compare to the previous quarter. Forty percent of California households earned the minimum income to qualify for the purchase of a $413,700 median-priced condominium or townhome in the fourth quarter of 2016, and an annual income of $81,550 was required to make monthly payments of $2,040.
Key points from the fourth-quarter 2016 Housing Affordability report include:
• Compared to affordability in third-quarter 2016, eight of 29 counties tracked saw an improvement in housing affordability (Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Los Angeles, Ventura, Monterey, Santa Barbara, and Madera), 10 experienced a decline (San Francisco, Sonoma, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Cruz, Kern, Kings, Merced, and San Joaquin), and 11 were unchanged (Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Fresno, Placer, Sacramento, Stanislaus, and Tulare).
• Only three (Contra Costa, Marin, Napa) of nine Bay Area counties recorded higher affordability numbers than the previous quarter, as higher earning Bay Area workers drove up home prices. Housing affordability results were mixed in Southern California but largely declined in Central Valley counties (Kern, Kings, Merced, San Joaquin).
• During the fourth quarter of 2016, the most affordable counties in California were Kings (56 percent); Kern (55 percent); San Bernardino (54 percent); and Fresno (50 percent).
• San Francisco (13 percent), San Mateo (15 percent), and Santa Cruz (17 percent) counties were the least affordable areas in the state.
Housing Affordability slides (click link to open)
Affordability peak versus current
Annual required income peak vs. current
PITI peak versus current
CA housing affordability by quarter (2006-2016)
Annual required income peak vs. current
PITI peak versus current
CA housing affordability by quarter (2006-2016)
Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than185,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Fourth quarter 2016
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Fourth quarter 2016
| C.A.R. Region | Housing Affordability Index | Median Home Price | Monthly Payment Including Taxes & Insurance | Minimum Qualifying Income |
| CA SFH | 31 | $ 511,360 | $ 2,520 | $ 100,800 |
| CA Condo/Townhomes | 40 | $ 413,700 | $ 2,040 | $ 81,550 |
| Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 34 | $ 463,050 | $ 2,280 | $ 91,280 |
| Inland Empire | 46 | $ 317,710 | $ 1,570 | $ 62,630 |
| S.F. Bay Area | 25 | $ 797,170 | $ 3,930 | $ 157,140 |
| US | 58 | $ 235,000 | $ 1,160 | $ 46,320 |
| S.F. Bay Area | ||||
| Alameda | 22 | $ 779,500 | $ 3,840 | $ 153,650 |
| Contra-Costa | 39 | $ 550,000 | $ 2,710 | $ 108,410 |
| Marin | 20 | $ 1,149,500 | $ 5,660 | $ 226,590 |
| Napa | 26 | $ 620,000 | $ 3,060 | $ 122,210 |
| San Francisco | 13 | $ 1,353,000 | $ 6,670 | $ 266,700 |
| San Mateo | 15 | $ 1,300,000 | $ 6,410 | $ 256,250 |
| Santa Clara | 22 | $ 1,005,000 | $ 4,950 | $ 198,100 |
| Solano | 45 | $ 392,500 | $ 1,930 | $ 77,370 |
| Sonoma | 26 | $ 589,000 | $ 2,900 | $ 116,100 |
| Southern California | ||||
| Los Angeles | 28 | $ 503,400 | $ 2,480 | $ 99,230 |
| Orange County | 22 | $ 745,160 | $ 3,670 | $ 146,880 |
| Riverside County | 41 | $ 356,380 | $ 1,760 | $ 70,250 |
| San Bernardino | 54 | $ 251,100 | $ 1,240 | $ 49,500 |
| San Diego | 26 | $ 593,040 | $ 2,920 | $ 116,900 |
| Ventura | 31 | $ 629,860 | $ 3,100 | $ 124,160 |
| Central Coast | ||||
| Monterey | 27 | $ 507,000 | $ 2,500 | $ 99,940 |
| San Luis Obispo | 25 | $ 566,550 | $ 2,790 | $ 111,680 |
| Santa Barbara | 21 | $ 681,340 | $ 3,360 | $ 134,300 |
| Santa Cruz | 17 | $ 800,000 | $ 3,940 | $ 157,690 |
| Central Valley | ||||
| Fresno | 50 | $ 237,300 | $ 1,170 | $ 46,780 |
| Kern (Bakersfield) | 55 | $ 225,810 | $ 1,110 | $ 44,510 |
| Kings County | 56 | $ 215,170 | $ 1,060 | $ 42,410 |
| Madera | 49 | $ 229,790 | $ 1,130 | $ 45,300 |
| Merced | 48 | $ 230,720 | $ 1,140 | $ 45,480 |
| Placer County | 46 | $ 434,720 | $ 2,140 | $ 85,690 |
| Sacramento | 45 | $ 324,300 | $ 1,600 | $ 63,930 |
| San Joaquin | 43 | $ 324,570 | $ 1,600 | $ 63,980 |
| Stanislaus | 48 | $ 276,000 | $ 1,360 | $ 54,400 |
| Tulare | 49 | $ 212,680 | $ 1,050 | $ 41,920 |
r = revised
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Fourth quarter 2016
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Fourth quarter 2016
| STATE/REGION/COUNTY | Q4 2016 | Q3 2016 | Q4 2015 | ||
| CA SFH | 31 | 31 | 30 | ||
| CA Condo/Townhomes | 40 | 40 | 39 | ||
| Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 34 | 34 | 32 | ||
| Inland Empire | 46 | 46 | 45 | ||
| S.F. Bay Area | 25 | 26 | R | 24 | |
| US | 58 | 57 | 58 | ||
| S.F. Bay Area | |||||
| Alameda | 22 | 22 | 22 | ||
| Contra-Costa | 39 | 37 | R | 38 | R |
| Marin | 20 | 19 | 17 | ||
| Napa | 26 | 25 | 21 | ||
| San Francisco | 13 | 14 | 11 | ||
| San Mateo | 15 | 15 | 14 | ||
| Santa Clara | 22 | 22 | 20 | ||
| Solano | 45 | 45 | 46 | R | |
| Sonoma | 26 | 27 | 28 | R | |
| Southern California | |||||
| Los Angeles | 28 | 26 | 27 | ||
| Orange County | 22 | 23 | 21 | ||
| Riverside County | 41 | 42 | 39 | ||
| San Bernardino | 54 | 55 | 53 | ||
| San Diego | 26 | 26 | 25 | ||
| Ventura | 31 | 30 | 26 | ||
| Central Coast | |||||
| Monterey | 27 | 25 | 25 | ||
| San Luis Obispo | 25 | 25 | 26 | ||
| Santa Barbara | 21 | 20 | 20 | ||
| Santa Cruz | 17 | 18 | 21 | ||
| Central Valley | |||||
| Fresno | 50 | 50 | 49 | ||
| Kern (Bakersfield) | 55 | 56 | 55 | ||
| Kings County | 56 | 57 | 61 | ||
| Madera | 49 | 47 | 48 | ||
| Merced | 48 | 50 | 55 | ||
| Placer County | 46 | 46 | 44 | ||
| Sacramento | 45 | 45 | 46 | ||
| San Joaquin | 43 | 44 | 46 | R | |
| Stanislaus | 48 | 48 | 45 | R | |
| Tulare | 49 | 49 | 54 |
r = revised
No comments:
Post a Comment